ASSIGNMENT
TOPIC:
ICT AND CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES: SCOPE AND
CHALLENGES
SUBMITTED BY:
ALPHONSA JOSEPH
SOCIAL SCIENCE
Introduction
The rapid development of information and communication
technology has great implications for the constructivist approach to teaching
social science. It offers a tremendous amount of information, tools for
creativity and development, and various environments and forums for
communication. Within a student-centered curriculum, the study is based on
student performance or research and new technology tools provide many
opportunities for students and teachers to build knowledge in an engaged
setting.
Significant changes brought in the social, economical and
cultural areas of society necessitated the need for new ways of literacy and new
forms of expertise, often referred to collectively as 21st century
learning. This learning involves critical thinking and problem solving,
communication and collaboration, creativity and innovation, information, media
and technology skills, life and career
skills.
Constructivist practices have been predicted as the most
suitable use of ICTs, and it has been widely assumed that the introduction of
ICT will be accompanied by the adoption of this approach to teaching. In the
literature on ICT in teaching, the term 'constructivist practices' refers to
student centred learning, where there is teacher-student and student-student
collaboration and co-construction of knowledge, in contrast to teacher-centred
practice which involves explicit instruction, knowledge transmission, linear
knowledge development, and more directly observable learning outcomes. There is
no doubt that new educational technologies are always charged with exciting
pedagogical properties and there is an understanding of the type of knowledge
that its learners ideally need to develop for the 21st century.
Constructivist Learning Theories
Constructivism proposes that learning environments should
support multiple perspectives or interpretations of reality, knowledge
construction, and context-rich, experience-based activities.Now
there are various sources for innovative
ideas on teaching and learning. Students are now learners who come to the
classroom with their unique backgrounds, experience, conceptual understanding,
learning styles and personal circumstances. Teachers now become learning facilitators
rather than reservoirs of knowledge. Psychology of learning has shifted from behaviorism
to cognitivism and to constructivism.
The
guiding principle of constructivist learning theories is the learner’s own
active initiative and control in learning, and personal knowledge construction,
i.e. the self-regulation of learning. The student does not passively take in
knowledge, but actively constructs it on the basis of his/her prior knowledge
and experiences.
The
learner’s learning activities should be directed at examining his own prior conceptions
and relating it to the new knowledge. The learning environment should provide the
learner with opportunities to test and try out his new conceptual understanding
in various applied circumstances like problem solving. Constructivism can
therefore be contrasted with objectivism,
the traditional view that knowledge is an external entity with an absolute
value which can be transferred from teacher to learner.
A
learner encounters a situation, acts on it and then thinks about what he has done,
makes inferences from the experience, determines implications, and retains the experiences
and reflections. The social constructivism focuses on knowledge, being a
product of activity, is situated in context and culture. Knowledge is
constructed and communicated through culture and social institutions, and
therefore the dimensions of constructivist learning theories can be
differentiated by examining the significance of the individual and the environment
in the process of knowledge construction.
It
was Vygotsky who pioneered a sociocultural approach to understanding cognitive processes
in childhood development. He studied how social and cultural interactions
were critical to cognitive functions. He believed that it is the need to
interact and communicate in socio-cultural context that makes human cognitive
development intellectual and distinct from animal cognition. By highlighting
the effects of social interactions on cognitive development, Vygotsky revealed
a critical role that external activities play in sparking internal mental
constructions. Understanding this interplay is at the heart of the paradigm
of constructivism.
Vygotsky’s
Zone of Proximal Development(ZPD)
emphasizes his belief that learning is fundamentally a socially mediated
activity. This zone is defined as the distance between a child’s “actual
developmental level as determined by independent problem solving” and the higher
level of “potential development as determined through problem solving” under
adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers. Vygotsky argued
that instruction should be tied more closely to the level of potential
development than to the level of actual development.
Constructionists
claim that learners construct knowledge most naturally
and
completely while they are constructing some artifacts. It is the idea of mental
construction. Active learning involves using knowledge and skills to generate a
product and this involve investigating to create a solution to a problem. A teaching
strategy with ICT enabled the generative learning.
Realistic
problems allow students to take ownership of their solutions, develop deeper,
richer knowledge structures, require more systematic problem solving methods,
and are more likely to benefit from collaborative efforts. Collaboration with
fellow students can have several benefits to learning. Students can encounter
different points of view which may identify ineffective solutions to problems,
clarify misconceptions, and give rise to synergistic insights. Group members
must understand their different roles and learn to accommodate conflicting
ideas. This reinforces individual responsibility and has been shown to have positive
effects on motivation to learn.
ICT and the Constructivism- A Paradigm
Shift
There
is wide consensus in education that learning is no longer seen simply as the
result of a transmission of knowledge. Nowadays pedagogical strategies employed
in the current ICT-based learning are linked to constructivist paradigm. According to constructivism, knowledge
is considered to be socially and individually constructed, learning is the
acquisition of meaningful competences in a realistic context, learning is
advanced through interactive and authentic experiences that dovetail with the
interests of the student and through active learning. So the focus is on the
development of a suitable environment for constructing knowledge rather than
for its transfer.
In
such an environment the use of ICT can trigger constructivist innovation in the
classroom contributing to the realization of meaningful authentic,
active-reflective and problem-based learning, a method that challenges students
to "learn how to learn", students seek solutions to real world
problems, which, based on an ICT framework, are used to engage their curiosity
and initiate learning, leading so to critical and analytical thinking.
The
constructivist education philosophy aims at a school where students learn how
to learn, in a learner-centered environment with emphasis on learning through discovery
and exploration and on experiences in the development of problem-solving
strategies. The ICT used teaching learning best deals with this objective of
education.
ICT & Constructivism in Social Studies
Meaningful learning of social
studies content, skills, and values through a constructivist approach is
designed to help teachers to facilitate students development into problem
solving and decision making who take an active role as citizens of their world.
The
appropriate ICT-enhanced activities, critical examples and strategies that can
be applied in the study of social science and practiced constructivist
innovation. It provided opportunities to examine how ICT can be used to promote
a constructivist, learner-centered approach to learn social science subjects.
It is designed the strategies for
teaching powerful social studies, the structure of the knowledge to be learned
and the theory and research explaining meaningful learning in social
studies. The students need to construct
knowledge in their own minds for it to be meaningful to them. ICT
offer a range of different tools for use in the school activities like
projector based learning,
audio
visual learning,
social
issues based learning, computer controlled microscope and map, publishing and
presentation system etc.
The ICT enabled social science class is
the basic motivating factor for the students to work with more interest and
zeal. The students also got the clear image about the subject matter. The clear
ideas were formed when we see, hear and
touch with our direct experiences. These direct experiences will be concrete
and permanent in the minds of the students.
The use of ICT in social science classes
gave the freedom to the students to learn in an effective environment. ICT used
learning is great scope for children to talk, laugh,critique and comment upon
the subject matter. ICT used constructive learning give variety in the learning
environment as well as in the subject matter. The students got sensory
experiences through the visual and hearing mediums. Which will enable them to
remember and recollect whenever necessary. ICT provide real life experiences to
the students. It promotes realism and it is the antidote to the verbal
instruction. ICT used social science study is more effective and pupil
centered.
The constructivist use of ICT in social
science teaching will gives:
·
Emphasis on learning rather than
instruction
· The
learning is considered asa process
· The
priority should be given to how to learn the social science subjects and how
can we imbibe the objectives of studying social science
· It
promotes the instinctive curiosity of the learners
· It
promotes the spirit of enquiry
· The learners can construct their own mental models
for studying the subjects
· It promotes the ability of exploration though the
use of internet and computer facilities.
· The students can experience the learning rather than
a mere rote learning
· It gives more priority to the social contexts which
the students are living
· It encourages the cooperative and collaborative
learning and promotes group activity and communication among students and
between the teacher and students
· It is based on the strong psychological principles
and caters the individual difference of the learners.
· It gives the opportunity for the learners to create,
construct and enlarge new ideas and concepts in their learning.
The Scope for ICT-enhanced Constructivist
Learning
ICT-enhanced
constructivist classroom practices, however, demand that teachers play a new
role. This means that opportunities, like exposure to a number of critical
examples and experience in designing ICT-based activities and integrating them
in their classroom practice in constructivist ways are of great priority. The
aim is to convince teachers for the potentiality of ICT as constructivist
learning tool through their own personal experience. For this reason the
development and implementation of appropriate courses is very important for the
teachers’ professional development and crucial for the success of innovative
approaches using ICT.
Teachers
need to go beyond traditional approaches and become acquainted with new methods
in order to get a clear understanding of the educational functionality of
technological tools in their educational practices. The approaches to staff
training include the need for awareness of the advantages and possible
difficulties of the proposed methods for school learning and usage of settings
and tools for training similar to those expected to be used in classrooms in
the sense of learning by doing and applying the new knowledge in real learning
contexts.
Challenges of ICT and Constructivist
Approach
With the wider scope of ICT and constuctivist approach in
teaching, we need to rethink whether we really want constructivist practices as
our aspiration or whether our aspiration should be learning conducive to our
current society. The teachers can prepare students for life and work in our
current society without using constructivist practices. A single-minded pursuit
of constructivist practices alone may actually be a hindrance to learning and
may obstruct the opportunity for teachers and school leaders to learn about
what meaningful pedagogy with ICT might be.
Conclusion
The generalized adoption of constructivist teaching
practices in schools is unlikely to be achieved simply through the extensive
resourcing of ICT in schools. It would most likely require a shift in emphasis
within the syllabus, from specific content knowledge towards non-cognitive
outcomes, values and citizenship education, as well as a strong emphasis on
informal learning. Professional development in support of these constructivist
practices would also need to allow for the depth and complexity of teachers'
commitment to their current approaches to teaching and unearth the inherent
innovative intellectual and creative potentials of the students ,thus enabling
them to ponder and critique on the prodigious steams of universal knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment